Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 17993

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2023 | Month : October | Volume : 17 | Issue : 10 | Page : ER01 - ER06 Full Version

Indiscriminate Nodule Sampling in Goitre: A Series of 5 Cases of Thyroid Microcarcinoma


Published: October 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/64657.18640
Sharon Roshin Reginald, Sharath Soman, P Rajkumar, Sivakumar Ponmudi, M Elancheran

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Medical College and Hospital, Perambalur, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Medical College and Hospital, Perambalur, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Medical College and Hospital, Perambalur, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Medical College and Hospital, Perambalur, Tamil Nadu, India. 5. Professor, Department of Pathology, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Medical College and Hospital, Perambalur, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Sharath Soman,
Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Medical College and Hospital, Perambalur-621113, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: dr.sharathsoman@gmail.com

Abstract

Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma (PTC), which is a form of thyroid cancer, originates from follicular epithelial cells and can be identified histopathologically by distinct nuclear characteristics and architecture. It is the most common thyroid neoplasm and is typically found in young females, with a good prognosis. Within the subset of PTC, exists incidentally detected lesions called papillary microcarcinomas (IPMC), having a size ≤1 cm which are usually clinically not suspected, radiologically undetected, and often missed in gross pathological examinations. The present case series highlights five cases (2 males and 3 females) of papillary microcarcinomas that were detected over the course of one year. The patients’ ages ranged from 31 to 60 years, with a mean age of 48.8±10.1 years. The male-to-female ratio was 1:1.5. These patients presented with complaints of neck swelling and were initially diagnosed with benign nodular goitre in 47 cases based on clinical and radiological evaluations. The detection rate of papillary microcarcinomas was 10.6%, with one case showing bilaterality (20%). The authors of the present case series adopted a novel approach of indiscriminate nodule sampling of thyroidectomy specimens to observe changes in detection rates. This approach facilitated a higher yield of papillary microcarcinomas. The authors also considered the dilemma of surgical measures and prognostic outcomes in such cases.

Keywords

Incidental papillary thyroid microcarcinoma, Multinodular goitre, Occult thyroid cancer, Papillary thyroid carcinoma, Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma

Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma (PTC) is the most commonly encountered thyroid neoplasm, exhibiting follicular cell differentiation and a set of distinctive nuclear features, and it carries the best overall prognosis. The tumour usually appears as an irregular solid mass, but in rare cases, it may have cystic features (1). Most occult thyroid carcinomas, also called incidental or microcarcinomas, are small thyroid carcinomas that are ≤1 cm, and the prognosis is poor when metastatic lesions are evident. Occult PTCs have been reported not to be detected as primary tumours on preoperative Ultrasonography (USG) or postoperative gross pathological examination (2). The mean age at diagnosis for PTC is 45 years, and it is also the most common thyroid malignancy occurring in children. Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma (PMC) is a specific subgroup of PTC and is defined by the World Health Organisation (WHO) 2017 classification of thyroid carcinomas, based on the largest dimension of 1.0 cm or less. Most PMCs are not detectable during clinical examination and are diagnosed incidentally during the pathological examination of thyroid specimens after surgery for benign thyroid diseases or in autopsies (1). Some studies have suggested that missing a PMC could pose a future risk of distant metastasis or adverse clinical outcomes, and hence the preoperative detection of these lesions would be desirable (3).

Unfortunately, studies have reiterated the difficulty of detecting PMC in the setting of multinodular goitre (4).

This series presents 5 cases of PMC, which were found incidentally from 47 thyroidectomy specimens removed for benign conditions solitary nodular goiter, multinodular goiter, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis etc., over a period of one year. This was achieved by adopting an indiscriminate sampling approach from every nodule of otherwise benign-appearing multinodular goitre, considering possible future surgical measures and prognostic outcomes in such cases.

Case Report

In the present case series, the authors encountered five cases of incidentally discovered PMC during a postoperative detailed pathological examination, using a modified grossing protocol. All of these lesions were missed during the preoperative diagnostic work-up, including radiology and Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) (Table/Fig 1).

Case 1

A 53-year-old male presented to the Surgery Outpatient Department (OPD) with complaints of swelling in the front of his neck and difficulty swallowing for three months. On clinical examination, a 6×3 cm swelling was observed to the left of the trachea, which moved on deglutition. There was no hoarseness of voice or any associated pain with the swelling. The clinical diagnosis was multinodular goiter. Ultrasound examination showed multiple scattered iso to hyperechoic nodules varying in size from 2.5 cm to subcentimetric in the left lobe of the thyroid, some with degeneration, suggesting multinodular goiter. FNAC showed clusters and singly scattered thyroid follicular epithelial cells against a background of cyst macrophages and blood-mixed colloid, leading to a diagnosis of colloid goiter. The thyroid profile was within normal limits. The patient underwent left hemithyroidectomy. Gross examination of the left hemithyroidectomy specimen revealed nodularity on the external surface, with the cut surface showing multiple nodules, the largest measuring 2.5×2.5×2 cm, some with haemorrhage and degeneration. After extensive sampling, microscopic examination revealed mainly follicles of varying sizes and areas of fibrosis. Within this, an unencapsulated focus of Incidental Papillary Microcarcinoma (IPMC) measuring 5.0 mm across was observed. The IPMC had well-formed papillae with fibrovascular cores, lined by a layer of neoplastic epithelial cells with optically clear nuclei. Areas of dystrophic calcification were also noted along the rims of the focus. The patient subsequently underwent a completion thyroidectomy, which revealed no other lesions, and subsequent follow-up over four months has been uneventful (Table/Fig 2)a-c.

Case 2

A 55-year-old female presented to the OPD with complaints of a left-sided swelling in the front of her neck that had gradually increased in size over six months. On clinical examination, a roughly 3×2 cm swelling was observed to the left of the trachea, which moved on deglutition. There was no hoarseness of voice or any associated pain with the swelling. A provisional diagnosis of solitary thyroid nodule was made. Ultrasound revealed a well-defined, large isoechoic nodule measuring 3.5×2 cm in the left lobe, with multiple cystic areas. The right lobe showed a few scattered iso to hyperechoic subcentimetric nodules. Based on these findings, it was clinically and radiologically diagnosed as solitary nodular goiter, with a possible differential diagnosis of multinodular goiter. FNAC showed benign thyroid follicular epithelial cells arranged in clusters and singly against a background of cyst macrophages and blood-mixed colloid. A cytological diagnosis of colloid nodule with degeneration was given. The thyroid profile was within normal limits. The patient underwent a left hemithyroidectomy, and the specimen was sent for histopathological evaluation. Gross examination revealed a solitary nodule measuring 3.5×2.5×2.5 cm, with areas of cystic degeneration on the cut surface. Microscopic examination showed mainly follicles of varying sizes and areas of fibrosis. Within this, a focus of unencapsulated incidental PMC measuring 3 mm across was observed. The IPMC had well-formed papillae with fibrovascular cores, lined by a layer of neoplastic epithelial cells with optically clear nuclei. The patient subsequently underwent a completion thyroidectomy, which revealed no other lesions, and subsequent follow-up over five months has been uneventful (Table/Fig 3)a-d.

Case 3

A 31-year-old female presented to the Surgery OPD with complaints of a right-sided swelling in the front of her neck for seven months. On clinical examination, a diffuse swelling measuring approximately 3×3 cm was felt in front of the neck, more towards the right-side of the trachea, which moved on deglutition. There was no hoarseness of voice or pain associated with the swelling. Ultrasound examination showed multiple hyperechoic nodules with a hypoechoic halo in the right lobe, ranging from 2 cm to a few subcentimetric ones. The isthmus also showed a few subcentimetric nodules. Peripheral vascularity was noted in both lobes, leading to a radiological diagnosis of right lobe colloid goiter with a possibility of lymphocytic thyroiditis. FNAC showed clusters and singly scattered thyroid epithelial cells, some admixed with lymphocytes, against a background of thick and thin blood-mixed colloid. A diagnosis of colloid goiter with lymphocytic thyroiditis was given. The thyroid profile was within normal limits. Right hemithyroidectomy with isthmectomy was performed. Gross examination of the specimen, measuring 4×4×2.5 cm, showed slightly nodular right lobe and isthmus on the external surface, with the cut surface revealing grey-white to grey-brown areas and areas of degeneration. A few nodules were also seen in the isthmus. Thorough sampling was done for all the nodules and other areas of interest, which were submitted for processing. Microscopic examination revealed a focus of encapsulated IPMC measuring 5.5 mm across, located in the periphery of the isthmus, amidst thyroid follicles of varying sizes. The patient subsequently underwent a completion thyroidectomy, during which no additional lesions were identified. Subsequent follow-up over four months has been uneventful (Table/Fig 4)a-e.

Case 4

A 60-year-old male presented to the OPD with complaints of swelling in the front of his neck that had been noticed for four months. On clinical examination, a diffuse swelling measuring 5×2 cm was felt in front of the neck, more towards the left-side of the trachea. Ultrasound showed well-defined, multiple large isoechoic nodules with cystic degeneration and a few coarse calcifications, primarily in the left lobe. There were also a few subcentimetric nodules in the right lobe, leading to a radiological diagnosis of multinodular goiter. FNAC revealed clusters and singly scattered thyroid follicular epithelial cells against a colloid background, resulting in a cytological diagnosis of nodular colloid goiter. The thyroid profile was within normal limits. The patient underwent total thyroidectomy, and gross examination of the specimen revealed large nodules ranging from 2 cm to 1 cm in diameter in the left lobe of the thyroid, as well as subcentimetric nodules in the right lobe. Histopathological examination showed that the nodules in the left lobe were colloid goiter. However, surprisingly, the right lobe, which appeared relatively normal grossly, harbored an unencapsulated micropapillary carcinoma with follicular architecture measuring 3 mm across. Subsequent follow-ups over three months have been uneventful, but later the patient was lost to further follow-up (Table/Fig 5)a-d.

Case 5

A 45-year-old female presented to the OPD with complaints of a large, diffuse swelling in the front of her neck that had gradually increased in size over two years. She also reported difficulty swallowing for the past three months. On clinical examination, a large nodular swelling roughly measuring 12x9 cm was observed in front of the neck, which moved on deglutition. There were no complaints of hoarseness of voice or pain associated with the swelling. Ultrasound reports revealed that the parenchyma of the thyroid gland was completely replaced by multiple heterogeneously hyperechoic nodules, ranging in size from 4 cm to subcentimetric ones. Multiple cystic areas were also noted, and no obvious calcific foci were seen. The radiological impression was multinodular goiter. FNAC yielded clusters and singly scattered thyroid follicular epithelial cells against a background of thick and thin colloid, admixed with cyst macrophages. A diagnosis of multinodular colloid goiter with degenerative changes was given. Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) was elevated in the present case. The patient underwent a total thyroidectomy, and gross examination of the specimen showed multiple nodules of varying sizes, ranging from 4x4 cm to subcentimetric ones. Some of the nodules demonstrated areas of degeneration. All the nodules were sampled and submitted for tissue processing. Microscopic examination revealed plenty of areas with varying-sized follicles, lymphocytic aggregates, and fibrosis. Within these, two foci of micropapillary carcinoma were identified; one in the right lobe measuring 8 mm across, and the other in the left lobe measuring 9 mm across, with a focus of calcification. Further sampling was done to look for additional foci considering the size of the thyroid, but no other lesions were observed. Hence, a diagnosis of bilateral IPMC was rendered on histopathology. The patient was referred to a higher centre and underwent Radioactive Iodine Therapy (RAI). Subsequent follow-up over a period of six months has been uneventful, after which she was lost to further follow-up (Table/Fig 6)a-e. All cases have been summarised in (Table/Fig 1).

Discussion

The term PMC refers to papillary carcinoma with a diameter of less than 1 cm, according to the 2017 WHO classification. However the recent 2022 update does not clarify the surgical and medical management of PMC cases (5). In the present study, authors received 47 out of 51 thyroidectomy specimens for various benign conditions, and incidentally identified 5 papillary microcarcinomas (10.6%) on microscopy. Among the 51 cases, four had presurgical malignancy diagnosis, with three being classical PTC and one medullary carcinoma. Among the five IPMCs, three were found in hemithyroidectomies and two in total thyroidectomies, with one case showing bilateral IPMC (20%). These findings, along with age and gender distribution, align with other IPMC case series and studies (6),(7). Grossing protocol modifications in the present study appear to have increased IPMC detection, while low incidence rates are possibly due to under-sampling in cases of multinodular goitre, attributed to a lack of a uniform protocol for grossing benign specimens, as indicated in other studies (Table/Fig 7) (6),(7),(8),(9),(10),(11),(12),(13). None of the patients in the present study had vascular invasion, capsular invasion, or nodal metastasis. One case showed thyroid profile derangement. Outcomes following thyroidectomies for three hemithyroidectomies were uneventful, while three cases were followed-up, and two were lost to follow-up.

Grossing protocols vary among institutions, but the main goal is to obtain enough tissue for an accurate diagnosis. The sampling process is influenced by visual examination findings and other clinical, cytological, and radiological details. Different textbooks in India suggest various approaches for sampling specimens.

For multinodular thyroid glands, Rosai’s Surgical Pathology manual; recommends taking one section of each nodule (up to five nodules) including rim and adjacent normal gland. Larger nodules may require multiple sections (1). Zhai’s manual suggests documenting and marking unsampled areas in larger goiter specimens for potential further sampling if malignancy is detected (14).

Lester’s Manual does not provide specific guidelines for sampling clinically diagnosed and radiologically evaluated MNG (15). In the present study, the authors adopted a novel approach, where thyroidectomy specimens were subjected to indiscriminate nodule sampling by trained pathologists, ensuring that every nodule was sampled after an initial thorough visual inspection. Serial sectioning along the long axis of the specimen at 0.5 cm intervals and inking of surgical margins were performed. The processed tissue sections were then stained and evaluated microscopically.

Sugitani I et al., classified PTCs ≤1 cm into asymptomatic and symptomatic PMCs based on metastatic lesions and symptoms. Asymptomatic PMCs (148 cases, 83%) without apparent lymph node metastasis or nerve palsy showed no distant metastasis or cancer-related deaths postsurgery (3).

Three biologically different PMC types emerged:

Type I: Incidentally detected asymptomatic PMCs with low risk. Ultrasonography follow-up every 6 or 12 months is suitable.

Type II: Early-stage low-risk papillary carcinoma. Lobectomy is sufficient if the size increases during follow-up.

Type III: Clinically symptomatic PMC with high-risk. Wider resection, radioiodine treatment, and TSH suppression are recommended (3).

In a one-year retrospective study of IPMC, Venkatesh S et al., found 10 cases out of 437 thyroidectomy specimens, representing a 2.3% incidence rate. This rate is slightly lower than the 3-17% published rates in the literature for patients previously diagnosed with benign thyroid disease [8,16]. Al Qaraghuli MMS and Alsaadawi conducted a 2-year study and discovered 86 IPMC cases out of 885 thyroidectomy specimens, resulting in an incidence rate of 9.71%, which is comparable to the 10.60% in our study (9).

The incidence of IPMC is increasing in certain populations, notably in South India (10), with the highest incidence globally observed in Finland (35.6%) and Japanese populations (18-24%), while Switzerland exhibits the lowest overall incidence at 1.2% (3),(8),(17). The mean age of presentation in the present study is 48.8 years, which is comparable to other studies (6),(9),(11),(18). However, some studies have reported both lower and higher mean ages of presentation (7),(10),(12),(19),(20). Age over 55 years is considered a risk factor for aggressive PMCs (10),(11),(18),(19),(20) and impacts clinical staging according to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging guidelines (8). In the present study, five cases were analysed, with three females and two males, indicating a slight female predominance (female-to-male ratio of 1.5:1). This trend aligns with other research [8,11,13,17]. Some studies found IPMC exclusively in females (10), while a few reported higher detection rates in males (1). Gender as a risk factor showed varying outcomes in some studies (18). Notably, some authors reported male sex as an independent risk factor for recurrence (19). The mean tumour size in the five cases of IPMC detected in the institution was 5 mm±2.3 mm, which corresponds to the mean tumour size reported in similar studies (6),(8),(11). Of the five cases, two foci had tumour sizes >6 mm in the present study. Other studies reported mean tumour sizes that were much larger at the time of detection (13),(18),(20), with Noguchi S et al., reporting that over 40% of their cases had tumour sizes >6 mm (17). As highlighted in these studies, a mean tumour size of >6 mm remains an independent risk factor for recurrence. Multifocality of PMC, linked to higher recurrence and distant metastasis, is defined as more than one focus in one lobe or one or more foci in one or both lobes. Bilaterality refers to foci in both lobes (10),(11),(12),(13),(21). IPMC’s reported multifocality rate is 13-14% (12). Multifocal IPMCs show aggressive behaviour, with recurrence and metastasis even after therapy (8),(17). Bilaterality is considered a risk factor, possibly more important for patient outcomes than multifocality (18),(22). Peluso G et al., reported 11 multifocal cases (12.3%), seven of them being bilateral IPMCs (7.8%) (11). In contrast, the present study had one case of bilateral IPMC (20%) with a focus in each lobe. This difference may be due to the larger sample size in the former study.

When considering IPMC with aggressive clinical behaviour, important risk factors include extrathyroidal extension and lymph node metastasis. Sadacharan D et al., reported one case of extrathyroidal extension (2.4%) where, on a 6-month follow-up, the patient developed cervical lymph node metastasis, leading to neck dissection (13). Venkatesh S et al., described one case with histological extrathyroidal extension and lymph nodal metastasis (9.09%), while Baudin E et al., reported higher rates (15%) [8,20]. Both were significantly higher than the rates in studies by Hay ID et al., (2.0%) and Noguchi S et al., (2.4%) [17,18]. However, Baudin E et al., and Hay ID et al., had higher rates of lymph node metastasis, likely due to their decades-long follow-up periods. In this case series, no extrathyroidal extension or lymph node metastasis was histologically detected, and the three cases with regular follow-up showed no lymph node metastasis to date. In most studies, distant metastasis was uncommon. Some studies showed lung metastasis 20 months postsurgery (13). Noguchi S et al., found five lung, four bone, and one mediastinal metastasis after 10.29 years (17). The present study, a case series, might need a longer follow-up period of 10 years or more to establish this parameter in the present patients without distant metastasis to date.

In various studies, the most common histopathological variant of IPMC is the classical type, which can be encapsulated or unencapsulated (9),(11),(17),(19), followed by the follicular variant. Rare aggressive types include diffuse sclerosing, tall cell, columnar cell variants, and papillary microcarcinoma with focal insular component (10). The present study observed the most common subtype as classical unencapsulated (3 cases), one classical encapsulated, and one follicular variant. Kaliszewski K et al., suggested that the BRAF V600E mutation may explain clinically aggressive IPMCs in the classical variant (21). PMCs associated with Graves’ disease, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, and lymphocytic thyroiditis may have reduced recurrence rates (17),(18). In the present study, one IPMC case was linked to lymphocytic thyroiditis with uneventful follow-up.

The PTCs and PMCs are increasingly detected via ultrasonographic diagnosis, even as small as 3 mm (21),(22). However, authors note that some IPMCs remain undetectable presurgery, often due to co-existing with large multinodular goitre. The small focus and deep location within nodules, especially when obscured by cystic degeneration, necessitate multiple passes during USG for multinodular goitre. Thus, these authors stress the fact that in every multinodular goiter, each and every nodule should be thoroughly examined, both by USG and postoperatively during grossing, as microscopic evaluation of the surgical specimen still remains the gold standard for detecting neoplasms in thyroid nodules (10),(21),(23).

The IPMCs are generally asymptomatic, but aggressive variants carry risks, leading to different management protocols worldwide. For example, Japanese centres opt for surveillance in low-risk IPMCs using repeat USG scans or biopsies (3),(17), while elsewhere others perform total or near-total thyroidectomies upon discovery (11),(23). South Indian studies report a combination of total or near-total thyroidectomies, most without central neck node dissection, and some with radioiodine ablation for multifocal, bilateral, or large tumours (>6 mm) (8),(10),(12),(13),(19). In the institution, three cases of hemithyroidectomies underwent completion thyroidectomies to treat IPMC after diagnosis, and the two total thyroidectomies were followed-up, with one undergoing RAI for bilaterality and larger tumour size. Since reports of postsurgical recurrence are variable, the definitive treatment and follow-up for these patients still remain controversial.

Conclusion

It is observed that cases of PMC are being missed due to under-sampling, often due to practical considerations such as cost and time constraints in most institutions. Additionally, the lack of a unified grossing protocol adopted in India contributes to this issue. Since studies show that IPMCs can exhibit clinical behaviour ranging from low risk to high-risk for metastasis and adverse clinical outcomes, the authors advocate for an indiscriminate sampling approach of thyroid specimens, regardless of the clinicoradiological conclusion. This approach is necessary to avoid missing these potentially troublesome lesions and to assist the clinical team in making timely and appropriate medical and/or surgical interventions.

References

1.
Tallini G, Giordano TJ. Thyroid gland. In: Goldblum JR, Lamps LW, McKenney JK, Myers JL, editors. Rosai and Ackerman’s Surgical Pathology, vol 1, 11th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2018, pp. 278-354.
2.
Yamashita G, Kondo T, Okimura A, Nakatsugawa M, Hirano H, Takeda A, et al. Occult papillary thyroid carcinoma without detection of the primary tumour on preoperative ultrasonography or postoperative pathological examination: A case report. Case Rep Oncol. 2020;13(1):105-12. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Sugitani I, Toda K, Yamada K, Yamamoto N, Ikenaga M, Fujimoto Y. Three distinctly different kinds of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma should be recognized: Our treatment strategies and outcomes. World J Surg. 2010;34(6):1222-31. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Thomas A, Mittal N, Rane SU, Bal M, Patil A, Ankathi SK, et al. Papillary and medullary thyroid carcinomas presenting as collision tumours: A case series of 21 cases at a tertiary care cancer center. Head and Neck Pathol. 2021;15(4):1137-46. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Jung CK, Bychkov A, Kakudo K. Update from the 2022 World Health Organization Classification of thyroid tumours: A standardized diagnostic approach. Endocrinol Metab. 2022;37(5:703-18. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Senel F, Karaman H, Aytekin A, Silov G, Bayram A. Incidental papillary thyroid microcarcinomas in thyroidectomy specimens: A single-center experience from Turkey. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2019;62(2):211-15. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Vasileiadis I, Karatzas T, Vasileiadis D, Kapetanakis S, Charitoudis G, Karakostas E, et al. Clinical and pathological characteristics of incidental and nonincidental papillary thyroid microcarcinoma in 339 patients. Head Neck. 2014;36(4):564-70. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Venkatesh S, Krishnan D, Kumar SP. Papillary microcarcinoma of thyroid- A clinicopathological study in a tertiary care hospital in South India. J Evolution Med Dent Sci. 2020;9(21):1627-32. Doi: 10.14260/jemds/2020/357. [crossref]
9.
AlQaraghuli MMS, Alsaadawi AR. The prevalence of micro papillary thyroid carcinoma and its correlation with age, gender and the histological background. WJAHR. 2022;6(11):01-04.
10.
Mathai AM, Preetha K, Valsala Devi S, Vicliph S, Pradeep R, Shaick A. Analysis of malignant thyroid neoplasms with a striking rise of papillary microcarcinoma in an endemic goiter region. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;71(Suppl 1):121-30. Doi: 10.1007/s12070-017-1156-8. Epub 2017 Jul 20. PMID: 31741946; PMCID: PMC6848467. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Peluso G, Masone S, Campanile S, Criscitiello C, Dodaro C, Calogero A, et al. Incidental thyroid papillary microcarcinoma on 1777 surgically treated patients for benign thyroid disease. memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology. 2020;13:126-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12254-019-00567-y. [crossref]
12.
Venu N, Hassan MB. Incidental micropapillary carcinoma in thyroidectomy specimens and criteria employed for diagnosis - A retrospective study. Int J Clin Diagn Pathol. 2021;4(2):84-86. Doi: 10.33545/pathol.2021.v4.i2b.363. [crossref]
13.
Sadacharan D, Chandru RK, Ayub MF, Ferdinant J. Incidental papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: Experience from a tertiary care center in south India. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research. 2018;5(10):J5-J7. [crossref]
14.
Asa SL. Thyroid. In: Zhai Q, editor. Grossing, staging, and reporting - An Integrated Manual of Modern Surgical Pathology, 1st ed. Illinois: College of American Pathologists; 2021, Pp. 28-36.
15.
Lester SC. Thyroid and Parathyroid Glands. In: Lester SC, editor. Manual of Surgical Pathology, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2010, Pp. 555-63. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Miccoli P, Minuto MN, Galleri D, D’Agostino J, Basolo F, Antonangeli L, et al. Incidental thyroid carcinoma in a large series of consecutive patients operated on for benign thyroid disease. ANZ J Surg. 2006;76(3):123-26. Doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03667.x. PMID: 16626346. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Noguchi S, Yamashita H, Uchino S, Watanabe S. Papillary microcarcinoma. World J Surg. 2008;32(5):747-53. Doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9453-0. PMID: 18264828; PMCID: PMC2323028. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Hay ID, Hutchinson ME, Gonzalez-Losada T, McIver B, Reinalda ME, Grant CS, et al. Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: A study of 900 cases observed in a 60-year period. Surgery. 2008;144(6):980-87. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
John AM, Jacob PM, Oommen R, Nair S, Nair A, Rajaratnam S. Our experience with papillary thyroid microcancer. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2014;18(3):410-13. Doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.131211. PMID: 24944940; PMCID: PMC4056144. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Baudin E, Travagli JP, Ropers J, Mancusi F, Bruno-Bossio G, Caillou B, et al. Microcarcinoma of the thyroid gland. Cancer. 1998;83(3):553-59. 3.0.CO;2-U>[crossref]
21.
Kaliszewski K, Zubkiewicz-Kucharska A, Kielb P, Maksymowicz J, Krawczyk A, Krawiec O. Comparison of the prevalence of incidental and non-incidental papillary thyroid microcarcinoma during 2008-2016: A single-center experience. World J Surg Oncol. 2018;16(1):202. Doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1501-8. PMID: 30305094; PMCID: PMC6180613.[crossref][PubMed]
22.
Rodriguez Schaap PM, Lin JF, Metman MJH, Dreijerink KMA, Links TP, Bonjer HJ, et al. Bilaterality, not multifocality, is an independent risk factor for recurrence in low risk papillary thyroid cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023:djad105. Doi: 10.1093/ jnci/djad105. PMID: 37267155.
23.
Abdul Jabbar MQ, Mutlak NS, Abdul Hussein W, Sulaiman TI. Incidental thyroid carcinoma. J Fac Med Bagdad. 2016;58(3):245-49.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/64657.18640

Date of Submission: Apr 19, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Jun 04, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jul 26, 2023
Date of Publishing: Oct 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 21, 2023
• Manual Googling: Jun 17, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jul 21, 2023 (9%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com